|
more interest expense in 2006, while reductions of outstanding
debt during fiscal 2006 reduced interest cost by approximately
$2.2 million and improved investment income performance
provided approximately $1.5 million of additional income.
Consolidated loss before taxes in 2006 of $122.5 million represents a decline
of $286.2 million, or 174.8%, from IBT of $163.7 million in
2005, with margin comparisons of (4.1)% of net sales versus
6.4% in 2005. Excluding both years’ asbestos charges,
consolidated IBT in 2006 would have amounted to
$257.5 million, an improvement of $15.8 million, or 6.5%,
from adjusted IBT of $241.7 million in 2005, with margin
comparisons of 8.6% of net sales versus 9.5% in 2005. This
decline in margin year-over-year reflects primarily the one-time
costs incurred during the second quarter of fiscal 2006, as
previously discussed, the negative margin impact from higher
material costs in 2006, and relatively low first-year IBT results,
as expected, from the illbruck acquisition.
Industrial segment IBT grew by $32.6 million, or 19.4%, to
$201.2 million from $168.6 million in 2005, mainly from the
strength of this segment’s organic sales growth. Consumer
segment IBT improved by $11.5 million, or 7.8%, to
$159.1 million from $147.6 million in 2005, also reflecting
mainly organic sales growth along with cost controls, partly
offset by the negative margin impact from higher material
costs in this segment. Combined operating IBT improved by
$44.2 million, or 14.0%, over 2005.
For a reconciliation of IBT to earnings (loss) before interest and
taxes, see the Segment Information table located on page 25
of this Annual Report.
The effective income tax benefit rate was
37.8% for 2006 compared to an effective income tax expense
rate of 35.8% for 2005.
In 2006, and to a lesser extent in 2005, the effective tax rate
differed from the federal statutory rate due to increases
principally as a result of an increase in valuation allowances
associated with losses incurred by certain of our foreign
businesses, valuation allowances related to U.S. federal foreign
tax credit carryforwards and other non-deductible business
operating expenses. The increases in the effective tax rate
were partially offset by the U.S. tax impact of foreign
operations and reductions in state and local taxes, including an
income tax benefit relating to changes in state tax laws and
the effects of lower tax rates enacted during fiscal 2006.
The effective income tax benefit rate for 2006 reflects the
impact of the $380.0 million asbestos liability charges.
Excluding these asbestos charges, the effective income tax rate
for 2006 would have been adjusted to a pro forma effective
income tax expense rate of 34.7%. The effective income tax
rate for 2005 reflects the impact of the $78.0 million asbestos
liability charges that year. Excluding those asbestos charges,
the effective income tax rate for 2005 would have been
adjusted to a pro forma effective income tax rate of 36.1%.
|
Net loss of $76.2 million for 2006
compares to net income of $105.0 million in 2005. This
$181.2 million decline reflects the impact of the $244.3 million
after-tax asbestos charges taken in 2006, versus $49.5 million in
2005, for a net difference of $194.8 million. Excluding the
impact of these asbestos charges, 2006 net income would have
been an adjusted $168.1 million, representing an increase of
$13.6 million, or 8.8%, from $154.5 million in 2005. Margin on
sales would have been an adjusted 5.6% in 2006 compared
with 6.0% of sales during 2005, with this 40 bps margin
difference mainly the result of the higher year-over-year
material costs and lower first-year earnings results, as
expected, from the illbruck acquisition.
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share in 2006 of ($0.65)
compare with $0.86 in 2005. Excluding the asbestos charges,
adjusted 2006 diluted earnings per common share would have
increased by 8.0%, to $1.35 from an adjusted $1.25 in 2005.
Operating activities generated positive cash flow of
$202.3 million during fiscal 2007 compared with $185.5 million
generated during fiscal 2006, an increase of $16.8 million or
9.1%. Factoring out the after-tax asbestos-related cash
payments and insurance recoveries of $33.3 million and
$37.7 million, respectively, operating activities generated
positive cash flow of $235.5 million in fiscal 2007 compared
with $223.1 million during fiscal 2006, up $12.4 million or
5.6%. Fiscal 2007 adjusted net income of $198.6 million,
which excludes $15.0 million ($9.7 million after-tax) in
asbestos-related insurance recoveries, reflects an improvement
of $30.5 million over fiscal 2006 adjusted net income of
$168.1 million, which was affected by $380.0 million
($244.3 million after-tax) in charges for asbestos-related
liabilities but had no effect on cash flow. The improvement in
cash flow of $12.4 million, as discussed above, was positively
impacted by additional depreciation and amortization of
$7.3 million versus the prior period, while trade accounts
receivable required a usage of $15.5 million in cash flow
year-over-year, principally associated with an increase in sales
versus the prior year and an unfavorable increase of 2.1 days
in days sales outstanding ("DSO") since May 31, 2006. On the
other hand, inventories provided $18.4 million in operating
cash year-over-year as a result of a 1.3 days improvement in
our days inventory outstanding ("DIO") since May 31, 2006,
while accounts payable required the usage of an additional
$4.7 million of cash year-over-year as a result of the increased
sales volume and the associated inventory purchases necessary
to support these levels, offset by timing of payments and a
2.7 day improvement in our days accounts payable outstanding
versus the prior fiscal year end. All other remaining year-overyear
balance sheet changes related to cash flows from
operations had a net unfavorable impact of $23.6 million.
|